Members of the Board of Directors (starts on May 31, 2024 and ends on May 30, 2027)
Given the unique nature of the shipping business, we work with partners with various backgrounds in the global market. Diversity on the board of directors and in the workforce is a valuable element to the company's operations. However, diversity also means a wide range of attributes. In the interest of consistency and stability, the disclosure of information lists only gender, nationality, age, concurrent positions as employee, and professional background.
The company emphasizes gender diversity and a broad range of professional knowledge and skills in the composition of our Board of Directors. The specific management goal is to have women comprise one-third of the board seats and to ensure that directors possess diverse professional skills, including accounting, finance, and law, to strengthen the board's structure.
The Board consists of 9 members: 5 independent directors (56%) and 4 non-independent directors (44%). Among them, there are 2 female directors (22%), 1 Japanese director (11%), 2 directors aged 30-50 (22%), and 7 directors aged over 50 (78%). Only the Chairman also serves as the President (11%), while the remaining 8 directors (89%) do not hold any employee or executive positions. Additionally, 3 directors (33%) have a background in the maritime industry, while the other 6 directors (67%) possess expertise in accounting, finance, law, and other fields. The proportion of female directors on the board has not yet reached one-third, primarily due to the historical and industrial characteristics of the shipping industry, which result in fewer female candidates with relevant industry experience. To address this, the company plans to utilize the independent director talent database platform to identify suitable female independent director candidates. The company aims to gradually increase the proportion of female directors within the next 1 to 2 board terms.
The Guidelines for Performance Evaluation of Board of Directors and Functional Committees state that the board of directors and functional committees shall perform performance evaluation at least once a year. Board evaluation shall be performed by external independent agencies or teams of experts and scholars at least once every three years.
Results of internal and external board evaluation shall be completed within three months after the end of a year.
Every year, when all questionnaires are completed and collected, the Corporate Governance follows the guidelines above to perform analysis, and includes quantitative indicators before presenting the report to the board of directors and making recommendations for improvement at the same time.
The Guidelines for Performance Evaluation of Board of Directors and Functional Committees state that the board of directors and functional committees shall perform performance evaluation at least once a year. The Board and functional committee members completed self-assessment questionnaires.
The Company hires an external institution to perform an external board performance evaluation every three years. The latest was when the Company received an external board performance evaluation report from KPMG on February 18, 2022. KPMG performed evaluation of the board of directors of Wisdom Marine Lines between December 22, 2021 and February 18, 2022. KPMG evaluated the board based on 88 items in nine criteria and the board members based on 27 items in six criteria.
Board evaluation consists of nine criteria: construction of a functional board, an effective board, professional development and continuing training, business outlook, fulfillment of roles and responsibilities, management of the management team, establishment of corporate culture, stakeholder communication, and performance evaluation.
Board member evaluation consists of six criteria: mastery of company goals and duties, awareness of director responsibilities, professional development and continuing education, fulfillment of roles and resonsibilities, degree of participation in company operations, and internal relations and communication.
The evaluation method combines data analysis, questionnaire, and interview, and use the results to issue the performance evaluation report.
KPMG concluded that the board of directors of Wisdom Marine Lines had made policies and processes according to the applicable regulations and domestic governance indicators. The board of directors consists of directors with relevant skills and training, and responsibilities are allocated according to experience in order to ensure the board and functional committees work effectively. The overall performance was rated between good and excellent.
Room for improvement in the board of directors was still identified in some of the nine criteria, such as an effective board, professional development and continuing education, and fulfillment of responsibilities.